منابع مشابه
Three Strikes and You’re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis
Cooper and Willis (2003) is the latest in a sequence of criticisms of our methodology for estimating aggregate nonlinearities when microeconomic adjustment is lumpy. Their case is based on “reproducing” our main findings using artificial data generated by a model where microeconomic agents face quadratic adjustment costs. That is, they supposedly find our results where they should not be found....
متن کاملPerfectionism is multidimensional: a reply to Shafran, Cooper and Fairburn.
provided a cognitive-behavioural analysis of perfectionism that focused primarily on self-oriented perfectionism. They argued against studying perfectionism from a multidimensional perspective that they regard as inconsistent with prior work on perfectionism as a self-oriented phenomenon. We respond to by offering historical, empirical, and theoretical support for the usefulness and the importa...
متن کاملSuch Stuff as Habits Are Made On : A Reply to Cooper and Shallice ( 2006 ) Matthew
The representations and mechanisms guiding everyday routine sequential action remain incompletely understood. In recent work, the authors proposed a computational model of routine sequential behavior that took the form of a recurrent neural network (M. Botvinick & D. C. Plaut, 2004). Subsequently, R. P. Cooper and T. Shallice (2006) put forth a detailed critique of that work, contrasting it wit...
متن کاملPerfectionism Is Multidimensional : a reply to Shafran , 43 Cooper and Fairburn ( 2002 )
51 Shafran et al. (2002) provided a cognitive-behavioural analysis of perfectionism that focused primarily 52 on self-oriented perfectionism. They argued against studying perfectionism from a multidimensional per53 spective that they regard as inconsistent with prior work on perfectionism as a self-oriented phenomenon. 54 We respond to Shafran et al. (2002) by offering historical, empirical, an...
متن کاملSuch Stuff as Habits Are Made On : A Reply to Cooper and Shallice ( 2006 )
The representations and mechanisms guiding everyday routine sequential action remain incompletely understood. In recent work, the authors proposed a computational model of routine sequential behavior that took the form of a recurrent neural network (M. Botvinick & D. C. Plaut, 2004). Subsequently, R. P. Cooper and T. Shallice (2006) put forth a detailed critique of that work, contrasting it wit...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Applied Physiology
سال: 2019
ISSN: 8750-7587,1522-1601
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00839.2018